Bodybuilding differences over time

[willieman]

Originally Posted by pincushn

I agree that Arnold looks the best...but look how fuckin big Dorian is in both pic's. Jesus man!! And his back is, well, shit I'm at a loss for words!!!

Dorian was big...and could come in shredded...I mean s-h-r-e-d-d-e-d......

I am on the side of quality, not quantity...ronnie (to me) is just not appealing, and is just big for the sake of being big.

[Hoss827]

Originally Posted by willieman

Dorian was big...and could come in shredded...I mean s-h-r-e-d-d-e-d......

I am on the side of quality, not quantity...ronnie (to me) is just not appealing, and is just big for the sake of being big.

Agreed....and how the fuck did he beat Jay in the ab and thigh pose?!

[MR.B]

Originally Posted by PumpDogg

I think it all boils down to preference. I like tall chicks with nice legs and butts. Some guys like chicks short and thick. One is not superior to the other. I happen to think that the bodybuilders of the 70's, and early 80's are more appealing to the eye. That is just my opinion though. It is human nature to want more and more. We are a species that always trys to one up some one. Bodybuilding has been no different than any other sport... we have continually evolved to bigger and more ripped than ever b4. Does this mean that they are the best of all time? Depends on what you find appealing. Feel me? Todays pro's are off the hook.. yes.. I like the pro's of the old, I think they will last longer than todays as far as health concerns etc... Just my 2cents

PD

I agree..Ronnie looks better as a monster I have great respect for the guy but I would take Arnold's Physique over anyone elses any day of the week..

[Budlite74]

good posts Hoss

[Hoss827]

Originally Posted by Budlite74

good posts Hoss

yeah I love this thread...so its like 20 good posts out of 1561 now LOL

[legz]

IMO Dorians back make Colemans look average. Yates was a FREAK