Go Back   Muscle Science :: Science Beyond Bodybuilding > MuscleSci News > News & Announcements

 
News & Announcements MuscleSci News

Debate over Bonds doesn't say if steroids actually

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-16-2006, 03:10 PM
    #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Omertá
Age: 42
Posts: 589
Rep Power: 5 Junkyard Dog is on a distinguished road
Re: Debate over Bonds doesn't say if steroids actually

Debate over Bonds doesn't say if steroids actually work
Sunday, April 16, 2006
Barry Bonds' early season homer drought and reports of a federal investigation into his grand jury testimony have added more fuel to the steroid debate. But thus far, the debate has been curiously short on facts regarding whether steroids actually work.

Simply because players use them doesn't mean they work. Players still try using corked bats and baseball has banned them, even though the laws of physics say no net benefit is possible - because any bat speed gained is erased by loss of bat mass.

There is not a single medical study that proves any benefit from steroid use that translates to hitting a baseball. There's not even "a shred" of evidence, according to Art De Vany, professor emeritus of economics at the University of California (Irvine).

It is true that homers last year were at their lowest levels since the supposedly great Steroids Summer of 1998. But last year's total was almost identical to 2002. And the approximately 10 percent decline from the homer-happiest years of recent time (i.e., the steroid years) is actually less variance than noted in every decade since the dead ball, even after adjusting for expansion.

De Vany wrote a recent study on the issue and explains that Bonds didn't exceed his average homer year when he blasted 73 anymore than Roger Maris did when he hit 61. De Vany adds that large swings in individual homer proficiency should be expected because hitting home runs is a form of genius at work. We have no trouble accepting that artists have tremendous variation between their handful of best works and their remaining catalog. So, De Vany says, we should accept similar variation in the best years of our best athletes.

What about three guys (Bonds, Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa) all breaking Maris' long-standing record over a few seasons? Perhaps a mere statistical anomaly. You wouldn't expect to roll the same number in dice three times in a row, either; but if you roll them bones often enough, it will surely happen.

Players presumed to take steroids did not hit the ball farther than players of the past. Mickey Mantle still has the longest recorded homer in history, which he hit in 1953 (506 feet, wind aided).

As for Bonds' age when he dramatically increased his homer rates, that, too, is not unprecedented. In fact, Hank Aaron's three best years in percentage of hits that were homers occurred when he was age 37, 38 and 39.
__________________
<span style=\'color:blue\'>Junkyard Dog</span>
<span style=\'color:red\'>Do it until it bleeds!</span>


<span style=\'font-family:arial\'><span style=\'color:red\'><span style=\'font-size:10pt;line-height:100%\'>Omertá</span></span></span>
Junkyard Dog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Evaluating the Real Health Risks cb25 Anabolic Discussion 0 01-29-2006 06:51 PM
Steroids, What You Dont Know Could Hurt Ya!! daved150 Anabolic Discussion 1 11-14-2005 10:54 PM
Reporter Goes Undercover cb25 Anabolic Discussion 9 11-14-2005 07:20 PM
Anabolic Steroids and the Athlete: The Legal Issues bigcity Anabolic Discussion 1 09-25-2005 08:46 PM
Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004 IBBAdmin General Chat & Conversation 1 11-24-2004 02:07 PM

Sponsors

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright Musclesci.com :: 2003 - 2008

Proud part of the Bluepearl Network


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285