| |||||||
| Register | Arcade | MuscleSci Supplements | MuscleBlog | MuscleSci CHEMS | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Computer Discussion Anything Related. Including Security, Consul & Gaming! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| #1 (permalink) | |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| what CPU is better -Big Mike- P4 3.0GHz AMD XP3200 CELERON D 330 3.06Ghz AMD Athlon 64 3200 what are all diff bout these?? which is better for applications and internet ... with some gamming? mostly photoshop ect... all can answer but bigmike always gives the best advice ![]() |
|
| #4 (permalink) | |
| Junior Member ![]() | My personal preference would be to go with the P4, as this is actually the fastest processor (AMD's tend not to run as fast as their spec) however, the AMD is 64 bit and will therefore take advantage of multi threading if you have a tendancy to use any CPU intensive applications designed for this (such as photoshop!). There are many applications that will be being designed for 64 bit CPU's and therefore its a good choice (also gaming will be designed for 64bit very soon). Only certain P4's have the 64 bit capability... Oh and windows will be 64 bit compliant very soon! So go with the AMD... Good luck... |
| | |
| #5 (permalink) | |||
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Mar 2003 Age: 28
Posts: 13,492
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
Quote:
If it were my decision I would save a few bucks and get the AMD 3200 I haven't looked in awhile but I think the price difference between the 3200 XP and 64 bit is pretty small so I personally would go 64 bit. | ||
| | |
| #6 (permalink) | |
| New Member ![]() Join Date: Jun 2006 Age: 22
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() | Celeron D sucks, it only has 256 cache Pentium 4s, first P4's *mine* uses the Williamette core, P4 256cache, then a couple months later those fucktards moved it up to 512k and beyond. Celeron sucks for gaming, and multitasking. I couldn't even load SOF2 on my friends Celeron 2.4ghz and it ran fucking fine on my oldass 1.59 p4. I play F.E.A.R. and SS2 damn well, and i'm getting Q4. wooee. AMD is helluva lot better than Intel. look at this. vAMD VS INTEL Even though that is the 64bit version of AMD and INTEL, it's pretty much the same for the 32bits. PS: if your going to ask how i run my games, (new ones well) I have a ATI 9700 Pro with a Zalman GPU heatsink, Model C.. and with the 80mm fan on top, plus ATI Tray tools, and some tweaks... Memory booster. etc |
| | |
| #7 (permalink) | |
| Junior Member ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: AB Age: 23
Posts: 155
Rep Power: 4 ![]() | AMD athlon 64, blows any of those up. Pentium is crapping right now because of amd built in cache it makes it so much more powerful with much less ghz. I am running the 3200 right now and its more then fast enough and there are no games that i cannot play but i also have a geforce PCI-e video card and 1gig ram building your own computer is definately the way to go |
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads |
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| masswithclass in a magzine | LuvMuhRoids | General Chat & Conversation | 2 | 11-19-2004 10:09 AM |
| Things missing from the Clinton Library | cb25 | General Chat & Conversation | 3 | 11-18-2004 08:42 PM |
| Windows XP question | ellocogrande | General Chat & Conversation | 11 | 09-20-2004 10:36 AM |
| Advice, plain, simple, and to the point | Slamd097 | General Chat & Conversation | 5 | 05-11-2004 11:18 AM |
| Who ever won that contest ski had going | Da Bull | General Chat & Conversation | 4 | 01-14-2004 10:43 PM |
Sponsors |
|