Go Back   Muscle Science :: Science Beyond Bodybuilding > Power & Strength Discussion > Strength Training Forum

 
Strength Training Forum Strength Training Discussion

low reps v high reps

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-28-2008, 01:46 AM
    #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 1 chrismortimer66 is on a distinguished road
Question low reps v high reps

low reps 1-4, high reps 6-9.
I train to be a strongman and I see alot of sites [powerlifting] claiming that low rep training is the way to go as far as strength training goes, making out high rep training is inferior, but alot of strongman comps the rep range is significantly higher then 4 reps. It usualy until your muscles are exhuasted with the weight or you have reach you rep max in the time permited.

Louie Simmons claims that training with low rep numbers will produce much more strength progression then high reps.

I am not so sure, I see all the articles on how to up your bench by 50lbs in 12weeks etc, but alls I see are articles in which your just tapering your reps down to a one rep max and upping your weight each week.

But this just looks like your swapping your reps for weight on the bar, is this just an illusion to con people into becoming powerlifters instead of strongmen?
Or after this 12 weeks can you bench in the previous rep range [6-9]with higher weight, if so would this improvement be significantly greater then if you where to train for those 12 weeks at a rep range of 6 to 9?

I have ready many of Louie Simmons articles [all on westside site several times]and do train with similar exerises, speed work, rack pulls etc as well as employing stretch bands, because alot of his stuff is about dynamic strength, which is a quality I strive for.

I just have a problem giving up the higher reps, i'm not sure it would that effective I guess.

Any opinions welcome.

Last edited by chrismortimer66; 06-28-2008 at 01:48 AM. Reason: spelling
chrismortimer66 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 06-28-2008, 02:26 AM
    #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Aurora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Age: 28
Posts: 1,255
Rep Power: 6 Aurora is on a distinguished road
Re: low reps v high reps

Well there are many ways to look at this, first of all if you train in a rep range you will be strong in that rep range. And you want to train your ATP-CP system, since that is what you will be using for strength if your just aiming for a 1RM. This means 10 second bursts (or under). Training explosively is highly effective for developing this system. I say explosively because speed is constant, what your going for is acceleration. So if you were to do higher rep range with lighter weights for fast pumping type movements under 10 seconds then it would still be effective as part of an overall program that includes the basic low rep scheme. At least thats my take.
Aurora is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 06:46 AM
    #3 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 1 chrismortimer66 is on a distinguished road
Re: low reps v high reps

I see what you're getting at about training the specific energy system, I've just been looking into athletic style pendulum wave training, which encompases strength/speed and speed/strength development which seems to fit the bill.
So I don't have to swap my reps, I can train low number one week and higher on another.
Hows the nutrition cert coming on?
chrismortimer66 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 09:21 AM
    #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Aurora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Age: 28
Posts: 1,255
Rep Power: 6 Aurora is on a distinguished road
Re: low reps v high reps

ya there is definately a relationship between power and strength.

My course is over, its just the studying, its long, tedious, boring. Thanks for asking :)
Aurora is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2008, 10:17 PM
    #5 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 0 MR .T is on a distinguished road
Re: low reps v high reps

I compete for strongman and i train low reps. Only reason I see to train high rep is for hypertrophy. You will increase your reps by doing your gpp and conditioning work. Low reps build power. tire flips, sled drags and prowler push will build conditioning. I train with a westside template.
MR .T is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most popular training techniques.. MR.B Training Discussion 9 03-04-2008 03:38 AM
A complete guide to maximum strength development part 4 diablo69 Training Discussion 0 04-19-2006 08:29 AM
Locked and Loaded Benway83 Training Discussion 1 06-26-2005 11:19 AM
Looking to get Larger stallion1js Training Discussion 24 05-08-2005 12:36 PM
3x3 workout... BIG TEXAN Competitors Chat Area 0 03-13-2004 02:15 AM

Sponsors

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright Musclesci.com :: 2003 - 2008

Proud part of the Bluepearl Network


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286