Quote:
Originally Posted by Aurora  I also use periodization for sure, but prefer more of a hybrid approach to training to kill 2 birds with one stone. A method that has worked for many. Never would I say not to strength train, its all part of the bigger picture. Volume should not take away from strength if done correctly. I also use alot of functional training, particularly in the beginning stages.
In any case this particular thread with this particular workout posted was a weak workout, and needed more volume to do any type of tissue damage or motor recruitment. |
If you truly think you cannot achieve enough tissue damage in 12 sets a bodypart, and think motor unit recruitment is a function of volume you are basing this on extremely limited experience and lack of knowledge. I always worry when I see posts where the poster keeps referring to what works for THEM. The person asking the question is NOT you. Telling someone that they need at least 24 sets a bodypart is poor policy as a moderator.
You should know that lifting tolerance is extremely variable and plenty of great physiques have been built on 12 sets or even MUCH less a bodypart. I don't think the original posters program is the greatest, but the volume per bodypart is not likely the problem with their lack of growth.
Not trying to be an asshole, but just being honest. Even the vast majority of pros do not do 24 sets a bodypart.
Iron Addict