Muscle Science :: Science Beyond Bodybuilding - View Single Post - what CPU is better -Big Mike-

Seabound07

Celeron D sucks, it only has 256 cache
Pentium 4s, first P4's *mine* uses the Williamette core, P4 256cache, then a couple months later those fucktards moved it up to 512k and beyond.

Celeron sucks for gaming, and multitasking. I couldn't even load SOF2 on my friends Celeron 2.4ghz and it ran fucking fine on my oldass 1.59 p4. I play F.E.A.R. and SS2 damn well, and i'm getting Q4. wooee.

AMD is helluva lot better than Intel. look at this. vAMD VS INTEL

Even though that is the 64bit version of AMD and INTEL, it's pretty much the same for the 32bits.

PS: if your going to ask how i run my games, (new ones well)

I have a ATI 9700 Pro with a Zalman GPU heatsink, Model C.. and with the 80mm fan on top, plus ATI Tray tools, and some tweaks... Memory booster. etc

	#6 (permalink)
Seabound07 New Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Age: 22 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0	Celeron D sucks, it only has 256 cache Pentium 4s, first P4's mine uses the Williamette core, P4 256cache, then a couple months later those fucktards moved it up to 512k and beyond. Celeron sucks for gaming, and multitasking. I couldn't even load SOF2 on my friends Celeron 2.4ghz and it ran fucking fine on my oldass 1.59 p4. I play F.E.A.R. and SS2 damn well, and i'm getting Q4. wooee. AMD is helluva lot better than Intel. look at this. vAMD VS INTEL Even though that is the 64bit version of AMD and INTEL, it's pretty much the same for the 32bits. PS: if your going to ask how i run my games, (new ones well) I have a ATI 9700 Pro with a Zalman GPU heatsink, Model C.. and with the 80mm fan on top, plus ATI Tray tools, and some tweaks... Memory booster. etc